<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What A Boob</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docgurley.com/2009/03/23/what-a-boob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docgurley.com/2009/03/23/what-a-boob/</link>
	<description>Posts from an Insane Healthcare System</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Gurley</title>
		<link>http://www.docgurley.com/2009/03/23/what-a-boob/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Gurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docgurley.com/?p=1448#comment-5385</guid>
		<description>Great points and I agree with both. Relactation is possible, but very rare if the mother decides in the peri-newborn period to not nurse (or if she did not ever attempt to nurse) - that is the exact group that I think this kind of negative media coverage most impacts - those moms who are ambivalent prior to giving birth and are post-partum exhausted. The concept that formula is an intervention is absolutely accurate - both clinically and epidemiologically. The norm is nursing and outcomes for formula (the intervention) are inferior in almost all studies. I really enjoyed the linked article about language - I feel the author&#039;s assessment is true about the impact of how we phrase this topic. Definitely gets you thinking! Thanks for the great comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points and I agree with both. Relactation is possible, but very rare if the mother decides in the peri-newborn period to not nurse (or if she did not ever attempt to nurse) &#8211; that is the exact group that I think this kind of negative media coverage most impacts &#8211; those moms who are ambivalent prior to giving birth and are post-partum exhausted. The concept that formula is an intervention is absolutely accurate &#8211; both clinically and epidemiologically. The norm is nursing and outcomes for formula (the intervention) are inferior in almost all studies. I really enjoyed the linked article about language &#8211; I feel the author&#8217;s assessment is true about the impact of how we phrase this topic. Definitely gets you thinking! Thanks for the great comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.docgurley.com/2009/03/23/what-a-boob/#comment-5259</link>
		<dc:creator>just wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docgurley.com/?p=1448#comment-5259</guid>
		<description>Ahhhh... thank you for that Dr. G! Quite cathartic.

Only wanted to make two brief corrections.  The first being that you absolutely can go back to breastfeeding once you&#039;ve stopped.  Heck women who have never breastfed (and even never been pregnant) have lactated.  Relactation is quite doable with a bit of support (IBCLC, Le Leche League, a well informed friend).

The second is that breastfeeding isn&#039;t best - formula is inferior.  As with all science we should be comparing the biological norm (breastfeeding) with the intervention (formula feeding).  IBCLC Diane Weissinger first brought this to my attention - her argument is summarized here http://breastfeeding.suite101.com/article.cfm/choosing_breastfeeding_language.

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh&#8230; thank you for that Dr. G! Quite cathartic.</p>
<p>Only wanted to make two brief corrections.  The first being that you absolutely can go back to breastfeeding once you&#8217;ve stopped.  Heck women who have never breastfed (and even never been pregnant) have lactated.  Relactation is quite doable with a bit of support (IBCLC, Le Leche League, a well informed friend).</p>
<p>The second is that breastfeeding isn&#8217;t best &#8211; formula is inferior.  As with all science we should be comparing the biological norm (breastfeeding) with the intervention (formula feeding).  IBCLC Diane Weissinger first brought this to my attention &#8211; her argument is summarized here <a href="http://breastfeeding.suite101.com/article.cfm/choosing_breastfeeding_language" rel="nofollow">http://breastfeeding.suite101.com/article.cfm/choosing_breastfeeding_language</a>.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xak</title>
		<link>http://www.docgurley.com/2009/03/23/what-a-boob/#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>Xak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docgurley.com/?p=1448#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>Awesome rebuttal, with one small inaccuracy--nursing CAN be resumed after weaning. It&#039;s called relactating and if more women knew about it, more babies could be getting the nutrition they biologically need after &quot;nursing strikes&quot; (which are when baby suddenly stops nursing, often confused for weaning, but true weaning happens gradually, over a period of several weeks to months at least) pass or mom weans and regrets it.

Other than that, bravo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome rebuttal, with one small inaccuracy&#8211;nursing CAN be resumed after weaning. It&#8217;s called relactating and if more women knew about it, more babies could be getting the nutrition they biologically need after &#8220;nursing strikes&#8221; (which are when baby suddenly stops nursing, often confused for weaning, but true weaning happens gradually, over a period of several weeks to months at least) pass or mom weans and regrets it.</p>
<p>Other than that, bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinchingAbe</title>
		<link>http://www.docgurley.com/2009/03/23/what-a-boob/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>PinchingAbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docgurley.com/?p=1448#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>All I have to say is that God does give you an instruction manual to get you going.... breast milk.  God didn&#039;t send you a baby and a case of formula with an Aloha and a shove out the door to figure it out yourself.  I can&#039;t believe any sane person would refute what God gives you.  It is a wonder how humankind survived (gasp) before formula.  I nursed both of my kids as long as I could (or they would) and saved myself at least $1,500 in formula costs upfront, less copays for doctor visits as toddlers... etc. etc.  I nursed mainly for health benefits though, not for financial reasons.  But as more and more health problems get connected to formula feeding, I am more and more grateful that I nursed them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I have to say is that God does give you an instruction manual to get you going&#8230;. breast milk.  God didn&#8217;t send you a baby and a case of formula with an Aloha and a shove out the door to figure it out yourself.  I can&#8217;t believe any sane person would refute what God gives you.  It is a wonder how humankind survived (gasp) before formula.  I nursed both of my kids as long as I could (or they would) and saved myself at least $1,500 in formula costs upfront, less copays for doctor visits as toddlers&#8230; etc. etc.  I nursed mainly for health benefits though, not for financial reasons.  But as more and more health problems get connected to formula feeding, I am more and more grateful that I nursed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

