Doc Gurley header image 3

Doc Gurley

Posts from an Insane Healthcare System

When Your Body’s Too Eager…

July 19th, 2008 · 2 Comments

Are there times when your body over-does it in the killing germs department? There’s a new argument that we should, in addition to treatment, be suppressing the human response to mega-infections by giving immune-suppressing drugs (specifically steroids). These studies run counter to the argument that our bodies know what’s best (and don’t tend to overdo things if left to its own - treated - devices). This approach (treatment plus suppression) has been a cornerstone of therapy for very few diseases (AIDS-related pneumocystis pneumonia was one of the first), but in the circumstances where its been done, it’s saved a lot of lives. This review looked at studies where immune-suppression showed a benefit in infection. So what diseases are we talking about?

Here’s the summary; but keep in mind - “all patients also received active antimicrobial agents in addition to placebo or corticosteroids. For patients with bacterial meningitis, tuberculous meningitis, tuberculous pericarditis, severe typhoid fever, tetanus, or pneumocystis pneumonia with moderate to severe hypoxemia, treatment with corticosteroids improved patient survival (group 1 infections). For patients with bacterial arthritis, corticosteroids were also beneficial and reduced long-term disability (group 2 infections). For about a dozen other infections, corticosteroids significantly relieved symptoms (group 3 infections), and clinicians should consider using them if symptoms are substantial. Corticosteroids were harmful in 2 infections, viral hepatitis and cerebral malaria (group 5 infections). We conclude that corticosteroids are beneficial and safe for a wide variety of infections, although courses longer than 3 weeks should be withheld from patients with concomitant human immunodeficiency virus infection and low CD4 counts.”

Wow. In my book, that’s a lot of human-body overeager germ assaults. Another interesting facet of this review is that the benefits that were identified were in diseases that are pretty unusual - maybe the human body’s scorch and burn approach to germs doesn’t work so well with atypical infections. The authors ought to be commended for keeping a wide-ranging and complicated topic clear and focussed. And, for those of us who are skeptical about “new” uses for drugs, keep in mind that steroids are not big profit items- so there’s not as much of a benefit for pushing them now.

Take home message: if you or a loved one is very ill with an atypical infection (the ones reviewed), ask your doctor about the possible benefits of immune suppression with treatment, even if suppressing the fight against germs seems counter-intuitive. Definitely something to mull over…

Tags: Feature · In the News





2 responses so far ↓

  • Ian Furst // Jul 19, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    Anecdotally here is an example; a 21 year old male came in with a deep neck infection related to a tooth where the infection had spread near the airway (but not an airway disaster). To keep him ‘out of the ICU’ at the time of the neck incision and drainage 125mg of solumedrol (steroid) was given to help keep swelling down near the airway. A fluminant infection developed into the mediastinum (the area around the root of the lungs and the heart) that nearly killed him (survival is about 50% for these infections). We believed the infection would not have been so virulent without the pulse of steroid. Q: if there is a chance of the infection spreading due to steroid should they only be reserved for those cases where the patients survival is at stake? Are the contraindicated in those pts where they are only being givin for symptomatic relief?

  • GruntDoc » Blog Archive » MedBlogs Grand Rounds 4:44 The 200th Edition! // Jul 21, 2008 at 11:08 pm

    [...] Gurley on steriods for atypical infections in Body’s Too Eager… (good post, but her prestigious award under her picture got my [...]

Leave a Comment